what they said (Hover the mouse cursor over underlined words for more info)
A colonoscopy -- with a flexible, camera-equipped tube guided into the colon as a means of looking for potentially cancerous polyps -- is a procedure that few people anticipate giddily.
Why, many wonder, can the invasive test not be done instead with modern diagnostic tools such as CT scans that use X-ray beams to create detailed images of organs.
The answer, according to a new Canadian study, is that the fancy new technology simply does not work as well for detecting cancer, and it costs a lot more money.
Further, about one-third of those who undergo a CT scan would require a follow-up colonoscopy.
"CT colonography has shown some promise but it's simply not matching up to the old method," Steven Heitman, a gastroenterology fellow at the University of Calgary and co-author of the new research, said in an interview.
The original article can be found at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20051011.wxhcolon11/BNStory/specialScienceandHealth/
The original article can found in the Media Doctor archives.
what we said (Hover the mouse cursor over underlined words for more info)
Overall a good story about the differences in risks and benefits between colonoscopy and CT scanning as a means of screening for colon cancer. This is a balanced story that also presents guidelines for screening, the need for screening, as well as rates on screening for colectoral cancer